Credible carbon information starts with independent evidence. One destination for organisational inventories, product footprints, GHG projects and bioenergy supply chains.
Defined scope. Traceable evidence. An independent conclusion.
Choose the information you need assessed. We define the criteria, boundaries and intended use before the engagement begins.
For companies reporting emissions across facilities and operations, with relevant value-chain categories included in the agreed scope.
For manufacturers and suppliers responding to buyer requests for credible emissions information about a specific product.
For projects reporting emission reductions or enhanced removals, from forward-looking project assumptions to historical results.
For bioenergy operators with scheme-specific emissions calculations, supply-chain evidence and greenhouse gas saving claims.
Agree the type of engagement and the intended users before work begins. Verification does not provide absolute assurance.
Evaluates whether assumptions, methods and projected information provide a reasonable basis for a future outcome.
Typical subject: a project plan or forecast.Evaluates historical emissions information and reported results against the criteria agreed for the engagement.
Typical subject: an annual GHG inventory or product footprint.ISO 14064-1, ISO 14064-2 and ISO 14067 address the relevant subject matter. ISO 14064-3 provides requirements for the validation or verification process. Applicable programme requirements are considered separately.
We assess the GHG statement against agreed criteria through a risk-based validation or verification process. The engagement defines what is covered, the assurance level and materiality.
Define your scope ↗Organisational or product boundaries, reporting period, sources, exclusions and the basis for including emissions.
Activity data, source records, emission factors, units, methodologies, allocation and material assumptions.
Evidence trails, data controls, consistency and whether the reported statement is supported by the available evidence.
Know what to prepare, what we review and what you receive at the end of the engagement.
Confirm the engagement type, intended use, criteria, boundaries, assurance level, materiality, impartiality and schedule.
Assess risks and sample supporting records. Conduct interviews and site visits where needed.
Your team responds to identified discrepancies and supplies corrections or additional evidence.
The work undergoes independent review before the verification conclusion is issued.
A validation or verification statement identifying the assessed information, criteria, scope, relevant period, assurance level and conclusion, with qualifications or limitations where applicable. Unresolved material matters or insufficient evidence may modify or prevent an opinion.
Conflicts of interest are assessed before acceptance and throughout the engagement. Threats that cannot be managed to an acceptable level can prevent us from accepting or continuing the work.
The organisational and project ISO 14064 services described on our existing GHG service page are offered on an unaccredited basis. Acceptance must be confirmed with the intended recipient. Product and ISCC engagements require separate confirmation of the applicable scope and recognition; no blanket accreditation claim is made here.
No. GHG verification covers the emissions information agreed in the engagement. It may support climate reporting, including Bursa Malaysia or IFRS S2 disclosures, but does not by itself establish compliance with an entire reporting framework.
No. Verified emissions data can support your baseline and progress reporting. Validation of science-based targets is a separate process carried out by SBTi Services.
Share the type of verification, reporting year, number and location of sites, relevant standard or customer requirement, available GHG report and target completion date. For products, include the product and life-cycle boundary.
Independence and impartiality must be assessed before accepting an engagement. Calculation support and verification require appropriate separation; the proposed arrangement is reviewed before work begins.
No. A GHG project assessment does not by itself register a project or issue carbon credits. The relevant programme’s methodology, registration, verifier eligibility and issuance rules apply separately.
Materiality considers both numerical thresholds and the nature or circumstances of a matter. Misstatements, exclusions and evidence gaps are evaluated to determine their effect on the conclusion.
Timing depends on the number of sites or products, data readiness, complexity, site visits and the resolution of findings. We confirm a proposed schedule after reviewing your scope.
Share the intended recipient’s requirements at the outset, including any accreditation or scheme recognition conditions. Scope, eligibility and the intended use of the statement must be confirmed before engagement.
Tell us what you need to validate or verify. Our team will discuss the scope, evidence requirements and a proposal suited to your operations.
+60 13-910 8724 ↗Trans Certification & Inspection Sdn. Bhd.
Visit our corporate website ↗